Sunday, March 01, 2015

Cruz: GOP Establishment Sabotaged Fight Against Amnesty for Illegals

 Ted Cruz tells it like it is.

Story HERE.

If the GOP leadership had really wanted to stop amnesty, Cruz explained, they would not have attached the provision defunding Obama’s amnesty to the DHS funding bill.

They would have attached it to a bill defunding the Environmental Protection Agency, “or some other non-essential agency.”

He described such agencies as “hostages the GOP could afford to hold.”
Cruz insisted GOP leaders knew all along that rank-and-file Republicans would never vote to defund the DHS during a time of increasing terror threats at home and abroad.
 Instead, he said, they chose a strategy that was clearly designed to fail.

You see, the establishment leadership of the Republican Party is corrupt and goes along with the Democrats and Obama.

If the Republican Party is to ever be relevant again, its ordinary members must purge the establishment of fake "Republican" traitors, with maximum, Joe-McCarthyist prejudice.

Otherwise, well, say hello to whatever Nikita Khruschev envisioned for America.

10 comments:

Unknown said...

I sincerely hope they listen to your advice and purge as much of the moderate centre as they can. Best way to get Hillary elected.

So are you a big Joe McCarthy fan?

Canadian Sentinel said...

I'll say this: Joe McCarthy was 100% right. That's all I need to say. And the failure to heed his warnings has led to the current situation gripping America. Tyranny. Communism. Go ahead and run disinformational spin and claim otherwise. Only brain-dormant fools will fall for the manipulation.

Canadian Sentinel said...

"Moderate center" is a myth. The establishment and its minions amongst the elected GOPers are corrupt and onside with Obama, not to mention socialist and engaged in aiding and abetting the destruction of America by aiding and abetting the Obama regime. But if you like the GOP establishment and are comfortable with them and their mythical, deceptive "moderation", then why don't you champion them against the Democrats? ;) Remember, the Bushes were part of the GOP establishment, ie. RINOs. So go ahead and champion Jeb Bush, eh...

Canadian Sentinel said...

The way to go is to STICK TO THE CONSTITUTION, perioid. This is not being done currently.

IF it's "far right wing" to champion going back to Constitutional Republicanism, then fine, go ahead and thusly label it. We will proudly wear the label. And call everyone who doesn't want the Constitution to be obeyed, such as Obama and the RINOs, communists, crony capitalists, traitors, subversives, tyrants.

Unknown said...

Dude, calm down. I am seriously agreeing with you. I hope the Republican party adopts, and is open and honest about, ALL your beliefs - on Muslims, on gays, on immigrants, on the great conspiracies that underlie your world. Trust me, when I read this kind of thing, I give it the widest possible audience I can, emphasizing that THIS is what REAL conservatism is all about.

Unknown said...

" Joe McCarthy was 100% right."

Really? 100%? Gee, even Ann Coulter doesn't claim that. But thanks - it's good to hear what a Real Conservative thinks is history.

Canadian Sentinel said...

Hmm. Either you don't know what he warned about, or you are unaware of what's what today, ie. that of which he warned... proving true.

Canadian Sentinel said...

I'm afraid I cannot help but wonder... are YOU one? The disinformation, the Alinskyist Rules stuff you constantly do to attempt to discredit my anti-conservative blogging... one cannot help but suspect YOU... But surely you understand that that's expected, logical and fair, given your communications tendencies...

Canadian Sentinel said...

And your Alinskyist weapon of ridicule is ineffective on me. It's expected. I'd be surprised if you didn't employ it. It's as if it's a strict requirement for you to use it.

Unknown said...

LOL. Sentinel, with respect, you don't actually know what Communism is or means. I understand that in your lexicon, it means "Bad People I Disapprove Of". However, in a serious, political discussion among adults, it actually describes a specific stream of economic and political thought.

No, I'm not and have never been a communist.

Now, if you actually knew something about McCarthy beyond what you've read in the dismal and dumb blogs that seem to fuel your world view, you'd realize why that's funny.

And as for ridicule - well, one must amuse one's self, mustn't one. However, you'll note that I usually begin our discussions with either a disputation of some "fact" you're presenting, or a challenged to your logic. The ridicule occurs after you refuse to engage in adult discussion.